Performance testing is often treated as an after thought. This mindset has cost enterprises dearly, leading to lost business opportunities and, in some cases, even damaging their brand reputation. So, how can organizations maximize the return on investment (ROI) from their business applications through effective performance testing? Let’s explore the key elements that should form the foundation of performance testing requirements.
In any performance testing engagement for business applications, there are five fundamental categories:
- Business Application (Non-Functional Requirements)
- Test Data Volume
- Test Infrastructure
- Performance Test Tools
- Test Personnel Skills
This article will delve into the cornerstone of these engagements—performance testing requirements—and why they need to be clearly defined early in the application lifecycle.
The Reality of Performance Requirements
In many organizations, defining performance testing requirements becomes an exercise in passing the buck. Common refrains from business and architecture teams include:
- “Let’s get the numbers from the tests.”
- “Based on your experience, what do you think the ideal numbers should be?”
- “What’s your recommendation for an ideal configuration?”
- “We can define this when we are a couple of months closer to release.”
Similarly, performance teams often counter with:
- “Business should define the performance requirements.”
- “Architects should clearly outline the SLAs.”
While it’s fair to expect mutual input, what often gets overlooked is that performance testing requirements vary significantly based on the application’s nature, technology stack, anticipated user arrival rates, geographic distribution, and other factors. The key to achieving optimal performance lies in collaboratively nailing down the right requirements early.
Foundational Elements of Performance Testing Requirements
At a basic level, performance testing requirements should address:
-
- Response Time and SLAs: Clearly define acceptable response times for various business transactions.
- Concurrency & Usage patterns: Anticipated concurrent business users factoring 3 years year-on-year business growth, & usage patterns.
- Throughput: Establish the number of transactions the system should handle per unit of time.
- Resource Usage: Define acceptable CPU, RAM, and I/O utilization for transactions under different load conditions.
However, today’s digital landscape adds complexity. With users accessing applications via desktops, laptops, mobiles, and tablets across diverse geographies, networks, and bandwidths, it’s crucial to include network and connectivity requirements as part of performance testing.
Workload Modeling and Holistic Insights
Effective performance testing requires a comprehensive workload model that encompasses:
- Key Business Transactions: Identify business critical workflows and resource intensive workflows to be tested along with the anticipated transaction count to be processed
- Data Volume Requirements: Define data needs for various scenarios, including retention periods.
- Workload Arrival Rates: Specify user arrival patterns and peak usage times.
- User Geo-Distribution: Map user locations to simulate realistic scenarios.
This holistic approach ensures that the performance testing strategy reflects real-world usage patterns, providing actionable insights for optimization.
Stakeholder Collaboration is Key
Success in performance testing hinges on collaboration. Business teams, architects, infrastructure/DevOps personnel and performance testing professionals must work in a consultative mode, each contributing their expertise. For instance:
- Business Teams: Define key performance indicators (KPIs) such as average, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of response times for critical operations.
- Architecture Teams: Provide detailed technical architecture inputs.
- Infrastructure/Dev Ops Teams: Provide infra, database insights from production or similar systems.
- Performance Testing Teams: Recommend parameters to monitor and report, ensuring alignment with business expectations.
By fostering a collaborative environment, stakeholders can ensure that all critical aspects of performance testing requirements are addressed, paving the way for a seamless go-live.
To summarize, performance testing requirements are not just about setting technical benchmarks; they’re about aligning business goals, user expectations, and technological capabilities. Organizations that treat performance testing as a strategic investment rather than as a checklist item will unlock greater value for their applications, enhance user satisfaction, and safeguard their brand reputation.
Are you ready to rethink your approach to performance testing? Then start by asking the right questions and bringing all stakeholders to the table.
